Herzog v. Soontug
| Andrew A. Herzog |
| Tom Soontug |
| 8:2008cv00255 |
| June 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Madison |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Petitioners Motion for Reconsideration (FilingNo. 27 ), liberally construed as a Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - The Petitioner's Motion to Reopen 23 , construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 10 ) is granted. Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice; All other pending motions are denied; and A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 6 , the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims is potentially cognizable in federal court; Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 6 is denied without prejudice to reassertion; The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus 6 to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first class mail. By Dec ember 5, 2008, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or an answer. The Clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 5, 2008: deadline for Respondent to file answer or motion for summary judgment. If a motion for summary judgment is filed by the Respondent, the steps set forth in the order shall be followed by the Respondent and Petitioner. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner shall have until October 22, 2008, to sign his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner is warned that if he fails to sign the Petition, this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further noti ce; and the Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: October 22, 2008: Deadline for Petitioner to correct signature deficiency.Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Herzog v. Soontug | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew A. Herzog | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tom Soontug | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
