Vacanti v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Milo Vacanti |
| Sunset Financial Services, Inc., Kansas City Life Insurance Co. and Bryan S. Behrens |
| 8:2009cv00044 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Douglas |
| F. A. Gossett |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, Fil. #50, is denied. Ordered by Judge Timothy J. Mahoney. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER - Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc's motion for leave to amend to file crossclaims (Case No. 8:08CV335, filing 170; Case No. 8:08CV00399, filing 169; Case No. 8:08CV00436, filing 160; Case No. 8:09CV00013, filing 122; Case No. 8:09CV00044, filing 87 ) is granted. Sunset shall file its cross-claims by or before July 15, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER - Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief is granted. (Case No. 8:08CV00335, filing 193; Case No. 8:08CV00399, filing 192; Case No. 8:08CV00436, filing 183; Case No. 8:09CV00013, filing 145; Case No. 8:09CV00044, filing 110 ). The court hereby takes notice of Plaintiffs' proposed brief, which was submitted with the present motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER - The Motion for leave to depose Bryan S. Behrens 83 is granted. Plaintiffs and Defendant Sunset Financial Services Inc. are granted leave of this court to depose Bryan S. Behrens as set forth in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
55
PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING CONFIDENTIALITY, entered by agreement of the parties. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
|
Filing
50
SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) planning report due 1/10/2011; proposed protective order(s) due 1/10/2011; Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures due 1/24/2011. The conference now set for 1/18/2011 at 9:30 AM will be held as previously scheduled. The Receiver may, but is not required to, participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER LIFTING STAY - The "Motion by Certain Investors to Lift the Stay" is granted, as follows: The stay entered on March 4, 2009, is hereby dissolved to the extent the stay applies to lawsuits filed by the moving investors. The Clerk of th e Court is directed to file this order electronically in the following cases: 8:08cv324 Carlson v. Sunset Financial Services 8:08cv335 Lustgraaf v. Sunset Financial Services 8:08cv347 Katz v. Sunset Financial Services 8:08cv399 Poole v. Sunset Financ ial Services 8:08cv422 Lohrman v. Sunset Financial Services 8:08cv436 Vacanti v. Sunset Financial Services 8:09cv013 Green v. Sunset Financial Services 8:09cv044 Vacanti v. Sunset Financial Services 8:08cv523 Behrens v. Arch Insurance Company. NOTE: Pursuant to chambers, the order is corrected to change the reference from 8:08cv44 to 8:09cv44. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 36 Motion to lift stay and for leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve the Amended Complaint no later than 11/1/2010. Defendants shall respond within the time allowed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 34 Joint Motion to Stay. This case is stayed until the interlocutory appeal in Vacanti v. Sunset Fin. Servs., et al., Case No. 8:08CV436 (D. Neb.), 8th Cir. No. 09-2965, is resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 96 Motion to Stay Proceedings (in 8:08cv13). All litigation and/or proceedings naming Bryan S. Behrens and/or National Investments, Inc., as parties shall be stayed, as against those parties, untilfurther order of this Court, with the following exceptions; The above-captioned case, SEC v. Behrens, et al., United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, Case No. 8:08cv13; Behrens v. Arch Insurance Company, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, Case No. 8:08cv523; and Behrens v. Blunk, filed in the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, at Doc. 1090 No. 178. The Clerk of the Court is directed file this Order electronically in the following cases currently pending before this Court: Carlson v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:08cv324; Lustgraaf v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:08cv335; Katz v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:08cv347; Poole v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:08cv399; Lohrman v. Sunset Financi al Services, Inc., 8:08cv422; Vacanti v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:08cv436; Green v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:09cv13; Vacanti v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc., 8:09cv44; and Behrens v. Arch Insurance Company, 8:08cv523. Additiona lly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to e-mail this Order to the following: Patrick E. Brookhouser, Jr. at pbrookhouser@mcgathnorth.com, Richard Jeffries at rickjeffries@clinewilliams.com, John W. Shaw at jshaw@bowse-law.com, Nick J . Kurt at nkurt@bowse-law.com, Steven E. Achelpohl at achelpohl@usa.net, Thomas K. Harmon at harmonlaw@bigplanet.com, Tory M. Bishop at tory.bishop@kutakrock.com, Angela Probasco at angela.probasco@kutakrock.com. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copies e-mailed as directed) (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
