Williams v. Dakota County Board of Commissioners et al
Plaintiff: Charvette Williams
Defendant: Dakota County Board of Commissioners, Dakota County Sheriff, Dakota County Department of Corrections and Rodney Herron
Case Number: 8:2009cv00201
Filed: June 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT. Ordered by District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KMG)
March 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 246 ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting 245 Stipulation for Dismissal. All remaining parties and causes of action herein are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys fees incurred. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 242 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's objection (Filing No. 219 ) to the order of the magistrate judge (Filing No. 216 ) is overruled. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 216 ORDER - The defendants' Motion to Dismiss Rodney Herron in His Official Capacity and to Amend Case Caption (Filing No. 196 in Case 8:09CV201; Filing No. 197 in Case 8:09CV288) is granted. The defendants' Objection to and Motion to Stri ke Plaintiff's Supplemental Expert Designation (Filing No. 198 in Case 8:09CV201; Filing No. 199 in Case 8:09CV288) is overruled and denied. The defendants may re-depose Dr. Fitzgerald at the plaintiffs' expense. Herron's Motion t o Bifurcate (Filing No. 202 in Case 8:09CV201; Filing No.203 in Case 8:09CV288) is granted. Jury trials against the County shall commence, if necessary, immediately after the trials against Herron with the same jury. The plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate (Filing No. 205 in Case 8:09CV201;Filing No. 211 in Case 8:09CV288) is denied. Any objection to this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Any motion to consolidate these cases for trial shall be filed on or before November 6, 2012. Any response to such motion shall be filed by November 13, 2012. Any motion to bifurcate any issue for trial in either case sh all be filed by November 6, 2012. Any response shall be filed by November 13, 2012. Plaintiffs shall have to November 6, 2012, in which to file a response to defendants' motions to dismiss (Filing No. 196 in 8:09CV201 and Filing No. 197 in 8:09CV288). Plaintiffs shall have to November 6, 2012, in which to respond to defendants' objections and motions to strike plaintiff's supplemental expert designation (Filing No. 198 in 8:09CV201 and Filing No 199 in 8:09CV288). Defendants shall have to November 9, 2012, in which to file a reply to plaintiffs' responses set forth in paragraphs three and four above. The court will hold a telephone conference with counsel for all parties on November 14, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. Counsel for the plaintiffs shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL )
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER - The defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Filing No. 88 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall maintain the Spencer Fane Report documents as Sealed Exhibit A to this Order with a text only entry. The original Sealed Exhibit A shall be maintained in the Clerk's Office without attaching an electronic version to the Order. The Sealed Exhibit A may be returned to counsel for Dakota County at the conclusion of these proceedings in accordance with Court procedures. Pursuant to NECivR 72.2 any objection to this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Order. Failure to timely object may constitute a waiver of any objection. The brief in support of any objection shall be filed at the time of filing such objection. Failure to file a brief in support of any objection may be deemed an abandonment of the objection. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. SEALED EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT MAINTAINED IN CLERK'S OFFICE(TCL )
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 111 PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 109 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER regarding Judgment 92 . It has come to the court's attention that the fees for the time counsel spent responding to the defendant's objection to her application for fees was not included in the court's judgment for attorney fees . Plaintiff has shown that 10 hours were expended. A supplemental judgment in the amount of $2,500.00, representing 10 additional hours of work at the rate of $250.00 per hour will be entered this date. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB)
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (Filing No. 72 ) is granted. Defendant's motion to strike (Filing No. 79 ) is denied. Plaintiffs' objection (Filing No. 81 ) is denied as moot. A judgment in conformity with this Memorandum and Order will issue this date. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB)
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Motion to Dismiss 60 . Defendant Rodney Herron's motion to dismiss claims against him in his individual capacity (Filing No. 60 ) is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB)
March 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 54 is granted. Plaintiff shall file her complaint on or before March 24, 2010. Defendants shall have to on or before April 13, 2010 in which to respond to the second ame nded complaint. Defendant James L. Wagner, in both his individual and official capacities, is dismissed from this action without prejudice. The clerk shall terminate Defendant James L. Wagner on the docket. The parties shall meet and confer and file their report pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) on or before April 19, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
March 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion 39 to dismiss or strike is granted in part and denied in part. The defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with respect to defendants Dakota County Board of Commissioners and Dakota County Department of Corrections, and denied in all other respects. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within 10 days thereafter. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAE)
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 32 Motion to Consolidate Cases Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PAV)
November 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 9 Motion to Extend ; overruling 13 Order on Appeal to Magistrate Judge Order; denying as moot 21 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 28 Motion to Strike ; Defendants shall have twenty days from the date of this order to respond to plaintiff's amended complaint. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, )
July 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that Attorney Dewey P. Sloan is to register for admittance to practice register for the System. Show Cause Deadline set for 8/14/2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copies Mailed)(MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Dakota County Board of Commissioners et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dakota County Board of Commissioners
Represented By: Vincent Valentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dakota County Sheriff
Represented By: Vincent Valentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dakota County Department of Corrections
Represented By: Vincent Valentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Herron
Represented By: Vincent Valentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charvette Williams
Represented By: Brian E. Buckmeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?