v. Jindra et al
Defendant: Ryan M Jindra, Envision Investment Advisors, LLC, Envision Financial Group, Inc. and Securities and Exchange Commission
Case Number: 8:2009cv00216
Filed: June 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Judgment by consent. The Plaintiff's unopposed 115 Motion to Dismiss Party is granted. The Plaintiff's claims against defendant Envision Financial Group, Inc. and En vision Investment Advisors (LLC) are dismissed. Defendant Jindras Consent (Filing No. 114 , Attachment 1) is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. Defendant Jindra is liable for disgorgement of $484,235.52, representing profits gain ed as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, which is deemed satisfied by the order of restitution in United States v. Jindra, No. 8:10CR43, Filing No. 101. By agreement of the parties, no civil penalty is imposed in this case. This co urts order for preliminary injunction, asset freeze, and other equitable relief (Filing No. 16 ) is hereby dissolved. Any frozen funds held in bank accounts as a result of the Temporary Restraining Order and Order of Preliminary Injunction (Fili ng No. 16 ) shall be applied to defendant Jindras criminal restitution order in United States v. Jindra, No. 8:10CR43. A Final Judgment and Injunction in accordance with Memorandum and Order and defendant Jindras Consent (Filing No. 114, Attachment 1) will issue this date. This court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Final Judgment and Injunction. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting Motion of Steven Lefler for authorization to pay Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered pursuant to this court's order of July 8, 2009 17 . Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $659.86 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Mr. Lefler shall file a written request to be relieved of his duties as "stand-by counsel" in these proceedings upon an appropriate showing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER -Based on the accounting filed 95 and Steven Lefler's Motion 94 for Authorization to pay Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered, Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $198.00 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 89 Motion for Attorney Fees - Pursuant to Order 17 , and based on the accounting filed 90 , Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $155.34 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 83 Motion for Authorization to pay for services rendered. Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $264.00 for services rendered to Steve Achelpohl. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
November 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER granting 79 Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER on the 71 Motion for Attorney Fees. Based upon the accounting filed 72 , Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $88.00 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
February 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting 66 Motion for authorization to pay Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered pursuant to this court's order of July 8, 2009 17 . Based upon the accounting filed 67 , Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $308.84 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER on the Motion for Attorney Fees 61 , filed by Steven Lefler for authorization to pay Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered pursuant to this court's order of July 8, 2009 17 . Based upon the accounting filed (Filing No. 62 ), Mr. Lefler is authorized to disburse $528.00 to Mr. Achelpohl for services rendered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER - Steven Lefler's motion for release of funds (Filing No. 47 ) is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL )
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS UNTIL SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 AND ALLOWING THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, aside from the exception noted below, the proceedings in this case shall be stayed until September 23, 2009. During the pendency of the stay, Defendants and Relief Defendant shall not be required to answer, respond to discovery, or produce information required by the Order of Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 16) at paragraphs 9A-E. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that as of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may seek discovery from third parties as provided for under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference will be held on September 23, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
July 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER regarding cashier's checks in payment of attorney fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, )
July 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, ASSET FREEZE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF - The SEC's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Filing No. 5 ) is granted asto Defendants Jindra and Envision Investment Advisors, LLC and ReliefDefendant Envision Financial Group, Inc as set forth in this Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL ) Modified on 7/7/2009 to add Copies mailed to pro se party(TCL ).
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER regarding 5 Motion for TRO (copy of this order mailed to Defendants). Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Jindra et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan M Jindra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Envision Investment Advisors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Envision Financial Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Thomas J. Krysa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?