Evans v. Cotton et al
Plaintiff: Charles Evans
Defendant: Cotton and John Doe
Case Number: 8:2009cv00233
Filed: July 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until July 23, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 23, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STRICKEN - MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's claims against Defendant John Doe are dismissed. The Clerk of the court is directed to terminate that party as a Defendant in this matter. This matter will only proceed on Plaintiff's claims a gainst Defendant Cotton. The Clerk of the court shall send ONE (1) summons form and ONE (1) USM-285 form to Plaintiff together with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. The Marshal shall serve the summons and Complaint without payment of costs or f ees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: "February 16, 2010: Check for completion of service of summons." Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with blank summons and 285 forms) (KBJ) Stricken on 10/20/2009 per 9 (JSF).
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff shall have until October 9, 2009, to amend his Complaint - Pro Se 1 ; The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 10/9/2009: Check for amended complaint. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted; the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees - Ordered by District Judge Laurie Smith Camp (Copy mailed to pro se party)(BMH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Cotton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?