Moore v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd.

Moore v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd.

Plaintiff:	Terrence L. Moore
Defendant:	Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
Case Number:	8:2009cv00399
Filed:	November 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
County:	Douglas
Presiding Judge:	F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit:	Defendant
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2010	Filing 44 ORDER granting 43 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadlines filed by Nebraska Beef, Ltd. The final progression order 30 is amended to provide that motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than 1/10/2011. Jury Trial continued to 5 /17/2011 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 2, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Laurie Smith Camp. Final Pretrial Conference continued to 4/18/2011 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
September 7, 2010	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 22 plaintiff's Motion for Telephonic Deposition. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to make himself available for deposition in Nebraska no later than October 20, 2010. The parties' Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery and Related Deadlines 28 is granted. An amended progression order will be entered separately extending all existing deadlines by approximately 90 days. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2010

Filing 44 ORDER granting 43 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadlines filed by Nebraska Beef, Ltd. The final progression order 30 is amended to provide that motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than 1/10/2011. Jury Trial continued to 5 /17/2011 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 2, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Laurie Smith Camp. Final Pretrial Conference continued to 4/18/2011 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )

September 7, 2010

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 22 plaintiff's Motion for Telephonic Deposition. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to make himself available for deposition in Nebraska no later than October 20, 2010. The parties' Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery and Related Deadlines 28 is granted. An amended progression order will be entered separately extending all existing deadlines by approximately 90 days. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence L. Moore
Represented By:	Benjamin W. Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
Represented By:	Craig F. Martin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?