Madej v. Bank of America, National Association et al
Eric Madej |
Does 1-10 (inclusive) and Bank of America, National Association |
8:2011cv00186 |
May 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Lyle E. Strom |
F.A. Gossett |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION on Bank of America's renewed motion to dismiss. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 20 ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until October 4, 2011, to file an amended complaint as described in his motion to amend (Filing No. 15 ) and motion to respond (Filing No. 16 ). Defendant's motion to dismiss (Filing No. 6 ) is denied as moot. De fendant is granted leave to file a second motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's amended complaint, should it desire to do so. Plaintiff's motion to respond out of time to Bank of America's motion to dismiss (Filing No. 16 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Withdraw Document. Filing 13 is deemed withdrawn. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting the Joint 11 Motion to Continue Rule 26 planning conference. The parties shall have fourteen days after the Court rules on defendants motion to dismiss to file their Rule 26(f) report. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.