Parsow v. Parsow's Fashions for Men, Inc. et al
| Debra L. Parsow |
| Parsow's Fashions for Men, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Parsow's Fashions for Men, Inc. |
| 8:2011cv00297 |
| September 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion for attorney fees, Filing No. 87 , is denied. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 63 , is granted. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 66 , is denied. Plaintiff's objection to index, Filing No. 70 , is denied. Plain tiff's motion for hearing, Filing No. 74 , is denied. Defendants' motion to strike, Filing No. 78 , is denied. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Protective Order. 1. The defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Filing No. 45 ) is granted. 2. The defendants' Request for Oral Argument (Filing No. 45 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
