Magisana v. Astrue
| Lolita Magisana |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 8:2011cv00317 |
| September 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Warren K. Urbom |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is affirmed. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief. The defendant on or before April 19, 2012, shall file and serve its response to plaintiffs brief; within one week after the defendant's answ er brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Case Management Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Extension to File Brief. 13 Case Management Deadline set for 4/9/2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
