Diamantopoulos v. State of Nebraska
||State of Nebraska
||Nebraska Attorney General
||December 13, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||8 Omaha Office
||Pro Se Docket
||Richard G. Kopf
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 22, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice to reassertion of a subsequent petition upon certification by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All pending motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|January 9, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Petition 1 . Because Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, The Clerk of the court shall send Petitioner an AO Form 240 application together with a copy of this order . On or before February 9, 2012, Petitioner shall complete and return the AO Form 240 application to the Clerk or else pay a filing fee of $5.00. If Petitioner does not return the completed form or pay the filing fee by such date, this case wil l be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 2/9/2012: Petitioner's IFP application or filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?