Betts v. Yasinskiy et al
||Mikhail V. Yasinskiy, Sergey V. Yasinskiy, YMV Transport, Inc., M & H Trailers, Inc. and Herbert Rodrigues
||Michael C. Betts, Jr.
||January 16, 2012
||Nebraska District Court
||8 Omaha Office
||Joseph F. Bataillon
||Thomas D. Thalken
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 15, 2012
ORDER upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on May 15, 2012, by counsel for the parties. On or before July 16, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at email@example.com, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whe ther the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. (Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 7/16/2012.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|July 16, 2012
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE- The Joint Stipulation and Motion to Dismiss, filing 39 , is granted; and All claims for relief against the Defendants in the above-captioned case are dismissed with prejudice, complete record waived, and all costs taxed to the parties incurring the same. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.