Segura v. Houston
| Eddy Segura |
| Robert Houston |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2012cv00060 |
| February 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this case. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1 ), the Court preliminarily determines that Claims One, Two, and Three, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By May 10, 2012, respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the Court. (Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 5/10/2012.) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
