United States of America v. $33,984.00 in United States Currency
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 5, 2013
ORDER granting the plaintiff's 33 Motion to Strike. The Clerk of Court is ordered to strike Bowens Answer, Filing No. 20 and Claim, Filing No. 14 , and enter a Clerks entry of default against Eric Bowen. The findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge 34 is adopted in its entirety. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|November 27, 2012
ORDER that the plaintiff's Motion to Strike 24 is deemed a Motion to Compel and is granted. Eric Bowen shall present himself for deposition to be rescheduled at the convenience of the parties counsel on or before January 18, 2013, or show cau se why his Answer and Claim should not be stricken for failure to comply with this courts orders. The deadline for the parties to prepare a proposed final pretrial conference order in accordance with NECivR 16.2 and submit it to the assigned magistrate judge is extended until after resolution of the plaintiffs motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|June 14, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Bowens motion to dismiss and amended motion to dismiss, Filing Nos. 8 and 16 , are denied. The claimant is given 20 days to file an answer. Plaintiffs motion to strike claimants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Filing No. 11 , is denied as moot pursuant to Filing No. 14 , Claimants Verified Claim to Property.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?