Pinkerton v. Unum Group
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 21, 2012
ORDER granting 17 Stipulation for Dismissal. The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay their own costs and attorney fees. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|November 19, 2012
ORDER that on or before December 19, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
|September 27, 2012
ORDER that t he plaintiff shall have to on or before October 11, 2012, to file an amended complaint to rename the defendant. The defendant shall have to on or before November 1, 2012, to file an answer to the amended complaint, otherwise the court will deem the May 21, 2012, Answer to be the defendant's answer to the amended complaint. The defendant shall file its motion for summary judgment on or before November 20, 2012. The plaintiff shall have to on or before December 17, 2012, to file a response to any motion for summary judgment previously filed and to file a motion for summary judgment. The defendant may file a reply in support of its own summary judgment motion and a response to the plaintiff's summary judgment mo tion on or before January 11, 2013. Within fourteen days following the court's ruling on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to conclusion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?