Nieman v. City of Hartington, Nebraska et al
| Casey Nieman |
| Deb Addison, Tim Burbach, Cody Christensen, City of Hartington, Nebraska, Gary Kruse and Brad Pietz |
| 8:2012cv00242 |
| July 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims of relief stated therein against the Defendants be, and they are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with costs taxed to the parties incurring the same. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: On or before May 30, 2014, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts .gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
