Titus v. Stanton, County of et al
| Ashley Titus |
| Stanton, County of and Michael Unger |
| 8:2012cv00261 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER - Titus' Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 86 ) is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)(Sent to Court of Appeals electronically)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER - Titus' Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Filing No. 82 ) is denied, without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER - The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 47 ) is granted. Titus' claims against Sheriff Unger and Stanton County, Nebraska, are dismissed. The defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Filing No. 74 ) is denied as moot. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, a separate judgment will be entered on this date in accordance with this Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 52 Motion for Protective Order. The Court, having reviewed the same, including the fact that both counsel have approved this order as to form, hereby grants said protective order to the extent requested as follows: 1. Plaintiff may designate her educational records and medical records as "confidential"; 2. Defendants may designate their employees' personnel records, histories, and reasons for employment separation as "confidential"; 3. Defendant Unge r may designate his personnel records, histories, and any reasons for employment separation as "confidential"; 4. The materials are to be used by the parties for purposes of this litigation only, and not to be given or provided to third pa rties for non-litigation purposes. The parties are permitted to make such designation upon entry of this Order in writing as otherwise set forth in the Joint Motion. Such designation shall not, however, preclude the use of a reference to the filing of such items or materials with this Court in support of any motion, filing, or opposition to any motion or filing in this Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER - The defendants' Motion to Determine Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' First Request for Admissions for Sufficiency (Filing No. 34 ) is granted. On or before September 9, 2013, the plaintiff shall serve amended responses to Request for Admission Nos. 1-3 and file a certificate of service as required by NECivR 36.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion to dismiss (Filing No. 9 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the plaintiff's claim for false arrest/false imprisonment (Count I II). Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the plaintiff's claim for excessive force (Count V). Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted with respect to that portion of Count IV of the plaintiff's amended com plaint that alleges deliberate indifference in failing to provide necessary medical care. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied with respect to that portion of Count IV of the plaintiffs amended complaint that alleges deliberate indifference to the plaintiffs safety while in custody. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects. Defendants' motion to strike is denied. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
