Widtfeldt v. Daugherty et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 10, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - By order dated January 31, 2014, the plaintiff was granted 14 days in which to file proofs of service with the Clerk of Court. Filing No. 10, Memorandum and Order at 2. He was advised that failure to do so would result in immediate dismissal. Id. That time has elapsed and the plaintiff has not filed proofs of service. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)
|January 31, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall file his proof of service in this case within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order with the Clerk of the Court for the District of Nebraska. Plaintiff's objections to the F&R are overruled in p art and granted in part. The F&R of the magistrate judge, Filing No. 7 , is adopted to the extent set forth in this Memorandum and Order; however, the court will not dismiss the case at this time. The magistrate judge is ordered to determine if the plaintiff complies with this Memorandum and Order and to take the appropriate steps thereafter. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)
|November 13, 2013
ORDER - The plaintiff has until the close of business on December 17, 2013, to file with the Clerk of Court evidence of service or show cause why this case should not be dismissed as against the defendants for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?