City of Bellevue, Nebraska v. Paradise Park, Inc. et al (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PER FILING #12)
||Paradise Park, Inc. and Howard Helm
||City of Bellevue, Nebraska and City of Bellevue
||U.S. Bankruptcy Court
||April 29, 2013
||Nebraska District Court
||8 Omaha Office
||Cheryl R. Zwart
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 17, 2013
BANKRUPTCY REFERRAL ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska pursuant to NEGenR 1.5(a)(1). The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall c lose this case for statistical purposes. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall deliver, or send electronically, the court file to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL )
|June 16, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Bankruptcy Judge Thomas L. Saladino's 13 Findings and Recommendation are adopted. This case is remanded to the District Court of Sarpy County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1452 (b), and for lack of subject matter ju risdiction. The clerk of the court shall mail a certified copy of this order and a copy of Judge Saladino's findings and recommendation, (Filing No. 13), to the District Court of Sarpy County. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Certified copies mailed to District Court of Sarpy County as directed) (ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.