Baker v. Colvin
||Robert Ray Baker
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
||January 14, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||8 Omaha Office
||Thomas D. Thalken
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 22, 2014
ORDER - The Commissioner's decision is affirmed, the appeal is denied, and judgment in favor of the defendant will be entered in a separate document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|January 14, 2014
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is granted; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and Complaint withou t payment of costs or fees. Service may be by certified mail pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and Nebraska law in the discretion of the U.S. Marshal. To obtain service of process on the defendant, the plaintiff must complete and return three summon s forms and three USM-285 forms. Upon receipt of the completed forms, the Clerk of the court will sign the summons forms, to be forwarded with copies of the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service of process. The parties shall use the above caption on future filings. The Clerk of Court shall amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of the defendant's name and title. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?