Broom, Clarkson, Lanphier & Yamamoto v. Kountze
Plaintiff: Broom, Clarkson, Lanphier & Yamamoto
Defendant: Edward Kountze
Case Number: 8:2014cv00206
Filed: July 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER that the Joint Motion to Amend Progression Order (Filing No. 159 ) is granted. The Motion to Amend Counterclaim (Filing No. 158 ) is hereby held in abeyance pending the parties' mediation. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, P laintiff shall file a response to the Motion to Amend Counterclaim within seven days of completion of the mediation. The Fourth Amended Progression Order (Filing No. 143 ) is amended as follows: a. Motions in limine, other than those challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial, shall be filed on or before May 12, 2017. b. Trial Exhibits shall be submitted by May 12, 2017. c. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for May 25, 2017, at 10 :00 a.m., in chambers, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. The conference shall be attended by lead counsel for represented parties. By the time of the conference, full preparation for trial shall have been made so that trial may begin immediately thereafter. The conference will include a discussion of settlement and counsel shall be prepared to discuss the subject. Counsel shall be prepared to make additional offers or proposals for settlement on behalf of their clients at the conference, and counsel shall be prepared to make or opine on recommendations for further negotiations and conferences. d. Trial is set to commence, at the Court's call, during the week of June 12, 2017, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and a jury. Unless otherwise ordered, jury selection shall be at the commencement of trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LAC)
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 143 FOURTH AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE that the parties' Joint Motion to Amend Progression Order and Briefing Schedule (Filing No. 142 ) is granted as set forth below. Deposition Deadline November 30, 2016. M otions in Limine, the briefing schedule on the parties' respective motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 702 (Filing Nos. 136-140) are extended to allow the response briefs to be file d by December 30, 2016, and reply briefs to be filed by January 9, 2017. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for March 7, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Trial is set during the week of March 13, 1017 in Omaha, Nebraska before the Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (LAC)
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER denying 129 Domina's motion to quash. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the defendant's motion to vacate or discharge the attachment, Filing No. 65, is denied. Defendant's objections to the magistrate judges order, Filing No. 87, are overruled. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 THIRD AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE- The parties' Joint 91 Motion to Amend Progression Order as set forth within the order. Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate is set for January 20, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.; Jury Trial is set for February 13, 2017 before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
December 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 SECOND AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE- The unopposed 72 Motion to Amend Progression Order is granted as set forth within the order. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for Novem ber 10, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Trial is set to commence, at the courts call, during the week of December 12, 2016, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
November 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the objection, Filing No. 48 , to the magistrate judge's order is overruled, and the decision of the magistrate judge, Filing No. 44 , is adopted in its entirety. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
November 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's 54 Motion to Compel Disclosures, Answers to Interrogatories and Response to Request for Production of Documents. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE- The plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Progression Order 63 is granted as set forth within the order. Final Pretrial Conference set for September 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in chambers of the undersigned; Jury Trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of October 17, 2016 before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting Kountze's 35 Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim. Kountze shall have until June 26, 2015, to file the counterclaim. Pursuant to NECivR 72.2 any objection to this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fou rteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Order. Failure to timely object may constitute a waiver of any objection. The brief in support of any objection shall be filed at the time of filing such objection. Failure to file a brief in support of any objection may be deemed an abandonment of the objection. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying the plaintiff's 15 Motion to Strike. The defendant's Motion to Strike Exhibits from Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Filing No. 20 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broom, Clarkson, Lanphier & Yamamoto v. Kountze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Broom, Clarkson, Lanphier & Yamamoto
Represented By: David J. Lanphier
Represented By: Seth E. Darmstadter
Represented By: Bruce R. Meckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Kountze
Represented By: Seth E. Darmstadter
Represented By: Bruce R. Meckler
Represented By: Larry E. Welch, Jr.
Represented By: Damien J. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?