Shoemaker et al v. General Electric Company
| Don Shoemaker and Yvonne Shoemaker |
| General Electric Company |
| 8:2015cv00275 |
| July 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER - On or before April 29, 2016, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal, or other dispositive stipulation, together with submitting to the undersigned judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The Clerk of the Court shall set a dismissal papers deadline of April 29, 2016. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: On or before December 18, 2015, the parties shall either filed a joint stipulation for dismissal of this case, or their Rule 26(f) Report for setting a progression schedule to trial.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Oral Motion. The deadline for filing the parties Rule 26(f) Report is extended to 10/30/2015. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
