Mansiameli v. Peart
| Daniel R. Mangiameli |
| Mario Peart |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2015cv00283 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's petition is dismissed with prejudice, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. The court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to Cancel Proceedings (Filing No. 14 ) is denied. Respondent's Objection (Filing No. 15 ) is sustained. Petitioner shall respond to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment by May 16, 2016. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: May 16, 2016 check for Petitioner's response. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the habeas corpus petition to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By December 7, 2015, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 7, 2015: deadline for Respondent to file s tate court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner: A. By December 7, 2015, Respondent must file all state court rec ords that are relevant to the cognizable claims. See, e.g., Rule 5(c)-(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Those records must be contained in a separate filing entitled: Designation of State Court Record s in Support of Answer. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 6, 2016: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the Court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
