Williams v. Colvin
Tilo'e C. Williams |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
8:2016cv00060 |
February 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees, Filing No. 23, is granted and attorney for the plaintiff is awarded $1,520.00. A separate judgment will be entered in conjunction with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees. Fees to be paid by the Social Security Administration are awarded in the amount of $3,546.80 and are payable to the plaintiff as the litigant and may be subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt owed to the United States. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Commissioner is hereby reversed and benefits awarded to the claimant. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order.Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL) |
Filing 10 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. 2 , is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.