Heisler v. Ted's Tobacco, Inc., et al
Deena Heisler |
John Doe 1 and 2 Inclusive, Ted's Tobacco, Inc., Trek Properties, LLC and Michael Wright |
8:2016cv00462 |
October 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Robert F. Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER that the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (Filing No. 28 ) are accepted. This case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF) |
Filing 25 SHOW CAUSE ORDER - that by or before April 11, 2017, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with this Court's order. (Filing No. 24 ) Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation to United States District Court Judge Robert Rossiter, Jr. that this action be dismissed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF) |
Filing 4 ORDER - The plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Filing No. 2 ) is granted; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KLF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.