Robinson v. Accelerated Receivables Solutions (A.R.S.),Inc. et al
||Accelerated Receivables Solutions (A.R.S.),Inc. and David W. Brostrom
||February 23, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||8 Omaha Office
||Susan M. Bazis
||Laurie Smith Camp
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 19, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF No. 37 , filed by Defendants Accelerated Receivables Solutions, Inc., and David Brostrom, is granted. The Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer, ECF No. 53 , filed by Defendants Accelerated Receivables Solutions, Inc., and David Brostrom, is denied, as moot. The Motion to Stay Discovery, ECF No. 54 , filed by Defendants Accelerated Receivables Solutions, Inc., and David Brostrom, is denied, as moot. The above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LAC)
|March 12, 2018
ORDER - The Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief, ECF No. 42 , filed by the Nebraska Collectors Association, Inc., is granted. The Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief, ECF No. 47 , filed by ACA International, is granted. The Nebraska Collectors Association, Inc., and ACA International will file their briefs on or before March 14, 2018. Plaintiff Trisha Robinson may respond within seven days after service of the briefs. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LKO)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?