Mick v. Wade et al
| Steven E. Mick |
| Douglas County Department of Corrections and Stephen Wade, Jr. |
| 8:2017cv00147 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are dismissed without prejudice, and judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 10, 2017: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force and deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs against Stephen Wade, Jr., in his individual capacity and against Douglas County m ay proceed to service of process. For service of process on Douglas County, the clerk of the court is directed to complete a summons form and a USM-285 form for defendant Douglas County using the address "Daniel A. Esch, County Clerk/Comptr oller, 1819 Farnam Street, Room H08, Omaha, NE 68183," and forward them together with a copy of the Complaint (Filing No. 1 ), the Supplemental Amended Complaint (Filing No. 9 ), and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Marshals Service . The Marshals Service shall serve Douglas County at Daniel A. Esch, County Clerk/Comptroller, 1819 Farnam Street, Room H08, Omaha, NE 68183. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-510.02 (Reissue 2016). For service of process on defendant Stephen Wade, Jr., in his individual capacity, the clerk of the court is directed to complete a summons form and a USM-285 form for defendant Wade using the address "Douglas County Correctional Center,710 South 17th Stre et, Omaha, NE 68102," and forward them together with a copy ofthe Complaint (Filing No. 1 ), the Supplemental Amended Complaint (Filing No. 9 ), and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Marshals Service. The Marshals Service shall serve Defendant Wade personally in his individual capacity at the Douglas County Correctional Center, 710 South 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102. Service may also be accomplished by using any of the following methods: residence, certified mail, or designated delivery service. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-508.01 (Reissue 2016). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the complaint on a defendant within 120 days of filing the complaint. However, Pl aintiff is granted, on the court's own motion, an extension of time until 120 days from the date of this order to complete service of process. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Pla intiff. The clerk of the court is directed to file under seal any document containing the last-known personal addresses for the defendants. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: January 1, 2018service of process to be completed. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the clerk of the court shall amend the caption in this case by replacing defendant Douglas County Department of Corrections with Douglas County. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which reli ef may be granted by July 26, 2017. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time specified by the court will result in the court dismissing this case without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: July 31, 2017check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $.19 within 30 days, unless the court extends the time in which he has to pay in respo nse to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the court. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 8, 2017: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff' ;s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed) (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
