Iskandr v. Douglas County, Nebraska

Plaintiff: Sanaa L Iskandr
Defendant: Douglas County, Nebraska
Case Number: 8:2017cv00306
Filed: August 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: Michael D. Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 32 , filed by Defendant Douglas County, Nebraska, is granted. The Motion to Strike, ECF No. 37 , filed by Plaintiff Sanaa Iskandr is denied. The above-captioned matter is dismissed, with prejudice. The parties will bear their own attorney fees and costs. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LAC)
June 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that the Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 13 ) filed by Terry A. White, Alexis S. Mullaney, and the law firm of Carlson & Burnett, LLP, is granted. The firm of Carlson & Burnett, LLP shall immediately serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and thereafter file proof of service showing compliance with this Order, listing the name and address of the person to whom notice was sent. The firm of Carlson & Burnett, LLP will not be relieved of applicable duties to the Court, Plaintiff, an d opposing counsel until proof of service is filed. Upon filing of proof of service pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order, Plaintiff will be deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, unless substitute counsel enter s a written appearance on her behalf. If substitute counsel does not enter a written appearance, Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court her current address and telephone number within five days of being served with this Order. Plaintiff may re tain substitute counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, Plaintiff must comply with all case progression deadlines, orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local R ules of Practice. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions, including payment of costs, attorneys fees, and/or dismissal of the case. Upon submission of proof of service as described in Paragraph 2 of th is Order, Terry A. White, Alexis S. Mullaney, and the law firm of Carlson & Burnett, LLP's appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiff will be terminated, and the Clerk of Court shall terminate electronic notice to them in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Iskandr v. Douglas County, Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County, Nebraska
Represented By: Sandra K. Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sanaa L Iskandr
Represented By: Alexis S. Mullaney
Represented By: Terry A. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?