Krause v. Metropolitan Entertainement & Convention Authority (MECA)
| Randall S. Krause |
| Metropolitan Entertainement & Convention Authority (MECA) and Metropolitan Entertainment & Convention Authority (MECA) |
| 8:2018cv00311 |
| July 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Metropolitan Entertainement & Convention Authority (MECA). Summons given to plaintiff Randall S. Krause. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Entertainement & Convention Authority (MECA), with receipt number 8047946, in the amount of $ 400; filed on behalf of Randall S. Krause. Summons issued as to defendant Metropolitan Entertainment & Convention Authority. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
