Ueding-Nickel v. Frakes
| Carl Ueding-Nickel |
| Scott Frakes |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2019cv00078 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORDS regarding: Memorandum and Order,,,,, Set/Reset Pro Se Case Management Deadlines,,,, #3 in support of answer by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent Scott Frakes. (Attachments: #1 Docket sheet Ueding-Nickel I, #2 Docket sheet Ueding-Nickel II, #3 Opinion Ueding-Nickell I, #4 Opinion Ueding-Nickel II, #5 Appellant brief Ueding-Nickel I, #6 Appellee brief Ueding-Nickel I, #7 Appellant brief Ueding-Nickel II, #8 Appellee brief Ueding-Nickel II, #9 Appellant reply brief Ueding-Nickel II, #10 Appellant PFR Ueding-Nickel II, #11 Transcript Ueding-Nickel I, #12 Transcript Ueding-Nickel II, #13 BOE suppression, trial and sentencing, #14 BOE pretrial motions hearing)(Tangeman, Erin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent Scott Frakes (Tangeman, Erin) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition (Filing No. #1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By April 8, 2019, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 8, 2019: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the procedures in this order must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the procedures in this order must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus with receipt number 8050755, in the amount of $5 filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Carl Ueding-Nickel. (LKO) |
| FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Petitioner Carl Ueding-Nickel. Receipt number 8050755, in the amount of $5. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
