Roberts et al v. ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company
| Lustgarten & Roberts, P.C., L.L.O. and Donald Roberts |
| Markel Insurance Co. and ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
| 8:2019cv00532 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 2/7/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by Markel Insurance Co. (Culhane, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Defendant ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company's ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 Defendant ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company's, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs regarding Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 filed by ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company by ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q) (Hartzell, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Jason Reichlyn on behalf of Defendant Markel Insurance Co. (Reichlyn, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Sean Hanifin on behalf of Defendant Markel Insurance Co. (Hanifin, Sean) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Markel Corporation, Corporate Parent Markel Corporation for Markel Insurance Co.. by Attorney Thomas J. Culhane on behalf of Defendants Markel Insurance Co., Markel Corporation, Markel Corporation.(Culhane, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Consent to Removal by Attorney Thomas J. Culhane on behalf of Defendant Markel Insurance Co. (Culhane, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent ALPS Corporation for ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company. by Attorney Kevin D. Hartzell on behalf of Defendants ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company, ALPS Corporation.(Hartzell, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs from District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number 19-8693 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4068391) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Kevin D. Hartzell on behalf of ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hartzell, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
