Harris v. Myers
| Kevin B. Harris |
| Michael B. Myers |
| 8:2020cv00235 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 COPY of Order from USCA - 8th Circuit (20-2491) If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (LKO) |
| Filing 14 Letter by Clerk of USCA - 8th Circuit (20-2491) regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 . (Attachments: #1 Pro Se NDA) (LKO) |
| Filing 13 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by Clerk to USCA regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 , Memorandum and Order #7 , Judgment - Pro Se #8 , and Memorandum and Order granting IFP #12 . Notice of Appeal filed on 7/21/20 by Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (LKO) |
Filing 12
ORDER - Plaintiffs Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Filing no. 10) is denied. Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The clerk's office is directed to provide the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals with a copy of this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 11 COPY OF IFP MEMO prepared by Deputy Clerk and sent to Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA #9 as to Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (LKO) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability on behalf of Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (LKO) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL regarding Memorandum and Order #7 and Judgment - Pro Se #8 on behalf of Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (LKO) |
|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT - PRO SE regarding Memorandum and Order, #7 . The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (and any amendments or supplements thereto) is denied and dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 filed by Kevin B. Harris. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 2241 (filing no. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. The court will enter judgment by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Kevin Harris on 7/6/20. Receipt number 8056756, in the amount of $ 5.00. (MKR) |
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's request to proceed IFP (Filing No. #2 ) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 27, 2020: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 4 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Douglas County Corrections, Attn: Candice Gaines, 710 South 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102. (KLF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by pro se Petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (KLF) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner Kevin B. Harris. (KLF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Myers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kevin B. Harris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael B. Myers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
