Sauermilch Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez |
Federal Bureau of Prisons |
8:2020cv00417 |
October 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of New Phone Number on behalf of Plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (LKO) |
Filing 9 MOTION on behalf of Plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (LKO) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address on behalf of Plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (LAC) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Federal Bureau of Prisons filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (KMM) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - On the court's own motion, Plaintiff will be given 30 days in which to file an amended complaint in compliance with this Memorandum and Order. Failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days will result in the court dismissing this case without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: "November 23, 2020: check for amended complaint." Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KMM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KMM) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (KMM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Prisons filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez. (KMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sauermilch Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.