Moss v. Frakes
| Nicholas M. Moss |
| Scott Frakes |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2020cv00474 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESTRICTED LETTER on behalf of Petitioner Nicholas M. Moss. Document #2 re-mailed on 12/3/2020. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Nicholas M. Moss regarding Notice by Clerk (Pro Se Case) #2 . Mail resent to SPR-LINC CORR CTR, Lincoln Correctional Center, P.O. Box 22800 Lincoln, NE 68542-2800. (MKR) |
| Filing 3 LETTER on behalf of Petitioner Nicholas M. Moss. (LAC) Modified on 11/16/2020 to correct party filing document (MKR). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (LAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus with receipt number 8058295, in the amount of $5.00 filed by pro se petitioner Nicholas M. Moss. (LAC) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Nicholas M. Moss on 11/12/2020. Receipt number 8058295, in the amount of $5.00. (LAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
