Morris v. 3D Transportation, Inc. et al
| Anitia Morris and Estate of David Morris |
| 3D Transportation, Inc. and Michael Segelke |
| 8:2020cv00534 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due March 1, 2022. Planning Conference set for 11/5/2021 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LRM) |
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - Settlement Likely by Attorney Stephen G. Olson, II on behalf of Defendants 3D Transportation, Inc., Michael Segelke.(Olson, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Stephen G. Olson, II on behalf of Defendant 3D Transportation, Inc..(Olson, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant 3D Transportation, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
|
Filing 8
RESTRICTED HEARING INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER - CONSENT Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 3/5/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by 3D Transportation, Inc., Michael Segelke (Olson, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendants 3D Transportation, Inc. and Michael Segelke. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Michael Segelke regarding Complaint, #1 . (Younes, Francis) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to 3D Transportation, Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Younes, Francis) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4306493), by Attorney Francis E. Younes on behalf of Estate of David Morris, Anitia Morris (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Younes, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
