Summage v. Frakes
Petitioner: Lenado S. Summage
Respondent: State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 8:2021cv00066
Filed: February 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Referring Judge: Richard G Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2021 Filing 10 STATE COURT RECORDS regarding: Memorandum and Order,,,,, Set/Reset Pro Se Case Management Deadlines,,,, #6 In Support of Answer by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent Scott R. Frakes. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet Summage I, #2 Docket Sheet Summage II, #3 Memo Web Opinion Summage I, #4 Memo Opinion Summage II, #5 Appellant Brief Summage I, #6 State Brief Summage I, #7 Appellant PFR Summage I, #8 Appellant Brief Summage II, #9 State Brief Summage II, #10 Appellant PFR Summage I, #11 Transcript Summage I, #12 Transcript Summage II, #13 Supplemental Transcript Summage II, #14 Second Supplemental Transcript Summage II, #15 Third Supplemental Transcript Summage II, #16 Trial BOE Vol. I, #17 Trial BOE Vol. II, #18 Trial BOE Vol. III, #19 Trial Exhibit 16, #20 Postconviction BOE)(Tangeman, Erin)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - that Respondent's Motion to Substitute Respondent (Filing #8 ) is granted. The Clerk shall update CM/ECF to reflect that Scott R. Frakes, the Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, is the sole respondent in this case. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
March 29, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Substitute Party by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent State of Nebraska.(Tangeman, Erin)
March 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent State of Nebraska (Tangeman, Erin)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition (Filing #1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By April 22, 2021, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 22, 2021: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 24, 2021: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing #2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
February 24, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Lenado S. Summage. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (TCL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Lenado S. Summage.(TCL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner Lenado S. Summage. (TCL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Summage v. Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lenado S. Summage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Douglas J. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nebraska
Represented By: Erin E. Tangeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott R. Frakes
Represented By: Erin E. Tangeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?