Holloway v. 130% Loan Sharks
Mary E. Holloway and Walter H. Holloway |
130% Loan Sharks |
8:2021cv00128 |
March 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO) |
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT - PRO SE- Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order #8 filed this date, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. #1 Main Document) (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) (MKR). Modified on 5/11/2021 to attach document (MKR). |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice as to Plaintiff Mary E. Holloway because she failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. This matter is not dismissed as to Plaintiff Walter E. Holloway. The next step will be for the court to conduct an initial review of the complaint to determine whether this matter should proceed to service of process. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 6 ORDER - Plaintiff Mary E. Holloway is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: April 26, 2021: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf.(Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 5 ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.Dated Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 130% Loan Sharks filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff's Walter H. Holloway and Mary E. Holloway. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.