S&H Distribution, LLC v. Meyer Laboratory, Inc.
| S&H Distribution, LLC |
| Meyer Laboratory, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv00178 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc..(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 14 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss #6 [Supplemental] by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit M. Degan, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Degan, Michael) |
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion to Extend. Defendant shall file its reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss #6 by June 17, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief #11 by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc..(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Cody B. Nickel on behalf of Plaintiff S&H Distribution, LLC.(Nickel, Cody) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Cody B. Nickel on behalf of Plaintiff S&H Distribution, LLC.(Nickel, Cody) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc..(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc..(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 7 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc..(Degan, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Natalie A. Pieper on behalf of Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc. (Pieper, Natalie) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff S&H Distribution, LLC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Meyer Laboratory, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against S&H Distribution, LLC from District Court of Sarpy County, Case number CI 22-367 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4633790) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Michael S. Degan on behalf of Meyer Laboratory, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Filings, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice)(Degan, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: S&H Distribution, LLC v. Meyer Laboratory, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: S&H Distribution, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cody B. Nickel |
| Represented By: | James F. Cann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Meyer Laboratory, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. Degan |
| Represented By: | Natalie A. Pieper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
