Wilkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
| Ryan D Wilkins and Ryan D. Wilkins |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company and Leonard Sherer |
| 8:2022cv00239 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Index of Evidence in Support of Plaintiff's Surreply Brief regarding UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #19 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Jennifer Turco Meyer, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to JTM Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to JTM Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to JTM Declaration)(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 19 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 18 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Companys Motion to Seal Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury #3 by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
Filing 17
TEXT ORDER granting in part and denying in part #15 Motion to Strike and/or Leave to File a Surreply. There is a question as to whether Union Pacific first needed to seek the Court's leave to file its reply brief because it did not file an initial brief until ordered to do so by the Court. See NECivR. 7.1(c)(3) ("If the moving party does not file an initial brief, it may not file a reply brief without the court's leave."). However, in the interest of justice, the Court will not strike the reply brief and will permit Plaintiff to file a surreply on or before August 26, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 16 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Strike and/or Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Surreply #15 by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Strike and/or Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Surreply by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion to Seal. Access to Union Pacific's Exhibit A to its Reply Brief shall remain sealed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal by Attorney Linda C. Schoonmaker on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Schoonmaker, Linda) |
| Filing 11 REPLY regarding Brief, #8 Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Seal Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury Demand and File an Amended Complaint by Attorney Linda C. Schoonmaker on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B)(Schoonmaker, Linda) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Hearing regarding MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Companys Motion to Seal Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury #3 Motion for In Camera Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Seal by Attorney Linda C. Schoonmaker on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Schoonmaker, Linda) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Access to Plaintiff's Index of Evidence #7 shall remain restricted to case participants and court users pending further order of the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Companys Motion to Seal Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury #3 by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT regarding UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #6 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan D. Wilkins.(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF in support of MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Companys Motion to Seal Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury #3 by Attorney Linda C. Schoonmaker on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Schoonmaker, Linda) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER - After review of Defendants' motion to seal #3 Plaintiff's complaint, the court finds it raises a substantial issue of law and must be supported by a brief. See NECivR 7.1(a)(1)(A). The supporting brief shall be filed on or before July 8, 2022. Plaintiff shall file an opposing brief on or before July 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (JLM)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to file under Seal Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Companys Motion to Seal Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand, or in the Alternative to Continue to Restrict Public Access at this Time and Require Wilkins to Withdraw His Complaint and Jury Demand and File an Amended Complaint by Attorney Linda C. Schoonmaker on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schoonmaker, Linda) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Remark - Public: At the request of the parties, the complaint was provisionally sealed pending motion and determination from the judge. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4664628), by Attorney Jennifer L. Turco Meyer on behalf of Ryan D Wilkins(Turco Meyer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
