Young v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
| Sarah Young |
| Nicole Ellingson, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Nicole Guthmiller and Deon Leitner |
| 8:2022cv00308 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark - Public: This case has been dismissed per the filing of the Motion and Stipulation for Dismissal #18 signed by all parties who have appeared. This case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees, costs and expenses. (LKO) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Attorney Tanya J. Hansen on behalf of Plaintiff Sarah Young.(Hansen, Tanya) |
| Filing 17 Certificate of Service by Attorney Tanya J. Hansen on behalf of Plaintiff Sarah Young.(Hansen, Tanya) |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Service by Attorney Tanya J. Hansen on behalf of Plaintiff Sarah Young.(Hansen, Tanya) |
Filing 15
CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 11/22/2023. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A planning conference to discuss case progression, dispositive motions, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on November 16, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LRM)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ORDER: The parties voluntarily consent to reassignment to the referral magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(i). Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon no longer assigned to case. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JES) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Tanya J. Hansen on behalf of Plaintiff Sarah Young.(Hansen, Tanya) |
| Filing 12 Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by Becton, Dickinson and Company, Nicole Ellingson, Deon Leitner (Millsap, Sarah) |
|
Filing 11
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 1/23/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the motion, Filing No. #5 , is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LKO)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #5 Defendants Nicole Ellison's and Deon Leitner's Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of Defendants Nicole Ellingson, Deon Leitner.(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF in opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Tanya J. Hansen on behalf of Plaintiff Sarah Young.(Hansen, Tanya) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #5 by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of Defendants Nicole Ellingson, Deon Leitner.(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of Defendants Nicole Ellingson, Deon Leitner.(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Becton, Dickinson and Company, Corporate Parent Becton, Dickinson and Company for Becton, Dickinson and Company. by Attorney Sarah J. Millsap on behalf of Defendants Becton, Dickinson and Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company.(Millsap, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Becton, Dickinson and Company. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(JAB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JAB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Nicole Ellison, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Deon Leitner from District Court of Custer County, Nebraska, Case number CI 21-61 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4699154) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Brock J. Pohlmeier on behalf of Nicole Ellison, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Deon Leitner(Pohlmeier, Brock) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
