Ajamu v. The State of Nebraska
Petitioner: Ojore Mulumba Ajamu
Respondent: The State of Nebraska
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 8:2022cv00348
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Ojore Mulumba Ajamu. (LKO)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. #3 , is granted. The next step in this case is for the Court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Ojore Mulumba Ajamu. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Petitioner shall no later than November 18, 2022, voluntarily withdraw his petition if he does not want this action to proceed as one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 or file an amended petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: November 18, 2022: check for motion to withdraw or amended habeas petition. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO 241)(ADB)
October 14, 2022 Filing 4 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. (LKO)
October 14, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Ojore Mulumba Ajamu.(LKO)
October 4, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Ojore Mulumba Ajamu. (LKO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ajamu v. The State of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ojore Mulumba Ajamu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Douglas J. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?