Pieper v. Sabatka-Rine
John Pieper |
Diane Sabatka-Rine |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2023cv00009 |
January 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 BRIEF in support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Sentence on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to present brief filed on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
Filing 5 BRIEF in support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper. (MKR) |
Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner John Pieper. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper.(MKR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of Petitioner John Pieper. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.