Behrens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Christopher A. Behrens |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
8:2023cv00050 |
February 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Michael D Nelson |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures by Attorney Reha Dallon on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Dallon, Reha) |
![]() |
Filing 12 Certificate of Service of Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by Attorney Jeffrey E. Chod on behalf of Plaintiff Christopher A. Behrens.(Chod, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Jeffrey E. Chod on behalf of Plaintiff Christopher A. Behrens.(Chod, Jeffrey) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Reha Dallon on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Dallon, Reha) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Dallon, Reha) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company on 2/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proof of Service of Process as to UPRR)(Chod, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Chod, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Designation of Place of Trial by Attorney Jeffrey E. Chod on behalf of Plaintiff Christopher A Behrens (Chod, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Company ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4798522), by Attorney Jeffrey E. Chod on behalf of Christopher A Behrens(Chod, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Behrens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Behrens | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey E. Chod |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Reha Dallon |
Represented By: | Sydney E. Richards |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.