Henry v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
Dee Ann Henry and Dee Henry |
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, Disability RMS and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company |
8:2023cv00072 |
February 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 6 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Brown, Eric) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Brown, Eric) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Brown, Eric) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Brown, Eric) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Brown, Eric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4811570), by Attorney Emily T. Newcomb on behalf of Dee Ann Henry(Newcomb, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.