Welch v. Morgan & Morgan, et al
| Brendan Welch |
| Morgan & Morgan and Justin Tomlinson |
| 8:2023cv00350 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 JUDGMENT from USCA - 8th Circuit (23-3086) This court has reviewed the original file of the United States District Court. It is ordered by the court that the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. See Eighth Circuit Rule 47A(a). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(LKO) |
| Filing 18 COPY of Order from USCA - 8th Circuit. If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (MKR) |
| Filing 17 Letter by Clerk regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA #12 (Attachments: #1 Pro se Notice of Docket Activity)(MKR) |
| Filing 16 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by Clerk to USCA regarding Memorandum and Order, #10 and Judgment - Pro Se, #11 ; Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis #15 , Notice of Appeal to USCA #12 . Notice of Appeal filed on 09/12/2023 by Plaintiff Brendan Welch. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR) |
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the plaintiff's #13 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address filed by Plaintiffs Brendan Welch and Welch Racing LLC. (JAB) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Brendan Welch. (MKR) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL regarding Memorandum and Order, #10 and Judgment - Pro Se, #11 filed on behalf of Plaintiff Brendan Welch. (Copy mailed to pro se) (MKR) |
|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - This case is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons discussed in the Memorandum and Order #10 entered on this date. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - As there is no jurisdictional basis in the Amended Complaint, Filing No. #9 , under which this case may proceed, this matter is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Morgan & Morgan and Justin Tomlinson filed by Brendan Welch. (JAB) |
| Filing 8 Summary Statement Letter on behalf of Plaintiff Brendan Welch.(LKO) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Plaintiff shall have until 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint that clearly states a claim or claims upon which relief may be granted against Defendant in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk's Office is directed to send to Plaintiff a copy of the civil complaint form. Plaintiff is instructed to attach additional pages to the complaint form as necessary. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/15/2023: Check for amended complaint) Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, Filing No. #3 , is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with civil complaint form)(MKR)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(SLP)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (SLP) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Summary Judgment on behalf of Plaintiff Brendan Welch. (SLP) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Brendan Welch. (SLP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Morgan & Morgan filed on behalf of Brendan Welch. (SLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
