Lightfeather v. Wagner et al
Austin Edward Lightfeather |
Wagner, Cardenas and Cody Miller |
8:2024cv00370 |
September 23, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (TCL) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Filing 9 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Filing 8 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Filing 6 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (JES) |
Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. (ADB) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (ADB) |
Filing 2 MOTION on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cardenas, Cody Miller, Wagner; no Summons(es) issued ; filed on behalf of Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.