Yarger v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Vicky Yarger |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
8:2024cv00438 |
November 8, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Lynnett M. Wagner on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.(Wagner, Lynnett) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney Kira Treyvus on behalf of Plaintiff Vicky Yarger.(Treyvus, Kira) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, by Attorney Kira Treyvus on behalf of Vicky Yarger (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Treyvus, Kira) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.