Hartwell v. Neven et al
| Willie Lamar Hartwell |
| D.W. Neven and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada |
| 2:2007cv01371 |
| October 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER Appointing Attorney Ryan Norwood as counsel for Willie Lamar Hartwell for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/2/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: USCA)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Denying 33 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order and 34 Motion to Alter or Amend Amended Order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
31
AMENDED ORDER DENYING 18 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Willie Lamar Hartwell. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY is GRANTED as to the issues stated in order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Denying 18 Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/18/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
