Shaw v. U.S. Department Of Justice
Plaintiff: Sandra K. Shaw
Defendant: U.S. Department Of Justice
Case Number: 2:2008cv01044
Filed: October 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Agriculture Acts Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Radiation Exposure Compensation Act appeal. Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/9/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw v. U.S. Department Of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra K. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department Of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?