Lucas et al v. Bell Trans
| Anthony Lucas, Gregory Castello, Lillian Melton, Leavon Smith and Robert Greene |
| Bell Trans |
| 2:2008cv01792 |
| December 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Clark |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Robert C. Jones |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
262
JUDGMENT. Enhancement Payments totaling $127,500.00 to be paid and distributed to the 13 Named Plaintiffs.The Court hereby awards Class Counsel attorneys' fees in the amount of $1,236,500.00, and costs and expenses in the amount of $76,759.29. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER Granting 249 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and Collective Action Settlement. The Final Approval Hearing is set for 5/21/2014 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER Granting 216 Motion to File Specified Exhibits Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 3/20/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER Granting 129 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' State Law-Based Claims for Relief, Denying 139 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, Denying 142 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying as Moot 157 Motion to Strike, Denying 170 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Denying 195 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER Denying 117 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall have until 6/3/11 to provide Plaintiffs with the names, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of the proposed class members. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER Denying 90 Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting 97 Motion to Strike, and Striking 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Circulation of Notice of the Pendency of this Action Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 261(b) and Other Relief 44 is GRANTED. Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer in a good faith effort to arrive at a mutually accepta ble form of notice, and shall submit a stipulation and proposed form of order no later than 10/11/10 in the event they are able to agree. In the event they are unable to agree, counsel shall have until 10/11/10 in which to submit a joint report ident ifying the portions of the notice on which they are unable to agree, and their competing proposals with respect to any portions of the notice on which they are unable to agree. Defendants shall have until 10/18/10 in which to provide Plaintiffs with the names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of the proposed class members. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 9/30/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING 30 Motion to Amend and Certify Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/14/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
