Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Atkerson et al.

Appellee: Robert Thomas Atkerson and Dawn Nicole Atkerson
Appellant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv00673
Filed: April 15, 2009
Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Clark
Referring Judge: George Foley
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Atkerson et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Robert Thomas Atkerson
Represented By: Steven A. Alpert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Dawn Nicole Atkerson
Represented By: Steven A. Alpert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan J. Works
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.